![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
Part 1: A History of Bitless Bridles |
||
This is the first part in a series of articles looking at bitless bridles. Over the coming issues topics covered will include: types of bitless bridles and how they work, reasons for choosing to use a bitless bridle, training the bitless horse (and rider) and the bitless bridle in sport and competition. There are two main parts in the history of bitless bridles (BB). The origins, when horses were domesticated over 5000 years ago, and a more recent history of the last 120 years in which we see the development of the BB as we know it today. The earliest patent for a bitless safety bridle was registered in the USA in 1893 by Improvements were soon made on this design, resulting in patents by I.Fox (1912) and N.Duehr (1915) where the metal strips were removed and replaced with a leather-covered metal noseband which transferred Over the next 70 years, the design of BBs was focussed very much on mechanical hackamores, the next BB patent being registered in France in 1982. During the 1980’s, three important developments occurred. Le Tixerant (1982) registered a system of pulleys which regulated pressure around the horses head, reducing pressure on any one particular point of contact – a principle used in the Equibridle. Meroth (1988) produced a design which used reins attached to It is often assumed that BBs naturally preceded bitted bridles and were then abandoned in favour of the bit, however, this is not necessarily true. Horses were domesticated around 50000 years ago and were kept primarily for meat and milk until they began to be used in agriculture and for transport approximately 5000 years ago. As horses were domesticated relatively late compared to other animals how they were controlled depended upon the methods used in controlling previously domesticated animals. In areas where the ox was widely used, control was obtained by a ring through the nose. There is some debate over whether this method was ever adopted for horses or not, based on a frieze of Sumerian horses. Some believe that the frieze shows an Onager (a type of Asiatic ass) rather than horses and the rings are part of a muzzle as the Onagers were renowned for biting. Whether or not the ring was used through the horses nose, it would have been abandoned as an ineffective control method for horses, due to the ring ripping through the nasal cartilage, and was probably developed to a ring round the bottom jaw and then to a bit in the mouth. This would have been the method adopted throughout the majority of the globe with rawhide bits giving way to metal ones. However, there are two exceptions that are worth mentioning. Firstly, the The second, and very influential, were the Berber Arabs who had a great deal of experience in camel riding. For similar reasons, the nose ring would have been of as little use on the camel as on the horse and a rope halter, reins and lead rope combination, called an Al Hakma, was the method used and transferred to horse riding. The Al Hakma was adopted by the Spanish Vaqueros after the Moorish invasion of the Iberian Peninsula in the 8th century AD, the bridle noseband was thickened, rawhide replaced rope and was referred to by the Spanish as the Jaquima. During the Moorish occupancy, the use of bits begins to occur across the Moorish empire, as riding techniques and equipment were traded throughout the empire. During the next 800 years, some Vaqueros continued to ride using the Jaquima and its use was transported to South America during the Spanish conquest. The convenience and availability of rawhide, as opposed to the arduous process of mining, smelting and forging metals ensured that the Jaquima continued to be used in South and Central America and the Southern United States where it developed into the Hackamore, or Bosal as it is known today. |
||
© W Wainwright This article was first published in Natural Horsemanship magazine, Oct/Nov 2007 issue |
||